@salmon_rushdie said in #10:
> Nobody said they didn't have the right to self-defense, but killing & abducting civilians isn't self-defense - targeting the IDF would be.
Except that all the "international community" equally condemns every action of resistance (no matter if carried against cilivians or military), denies Palestinian right of having a military force or security and, generally speaking, place as a pre-condition to recognize a Palestinian election result or government the safety of Israel. Never the other way around.
Really is anybody supporting Palestinians to target the IDF when South Africa filing an application at the International Court of Justice has triggered the freeze of humanitarian aid?
@salmon_rushdie said in #10:
> Tit-for-tat shit isn't going to solve this crisis,
100% agreed
@salmon_rushdie said in #10:
> Diplomacy will,
No, it will not. The closer we've been to solve it was in the 1990s, but you know how it ended. There is no reason to think it will work if tried again.
@salmon_rushdie said in #10:
> "Hamas and the allied Islamic Jihad have rejected an Egyptian proposal that they relinquish power in the Gaza Strip in return for a permanent ceasefire"
>
www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/hamas-islamic-jihad-reject-giving-up-power-return-permanent-ceasefire-egyptian-2023-12-25/That is just incoherent, I mean the writing, not you. Probably it is not true, and it has been denied by Hamas and Islamic Jihad.