Sure, of course 1.e4 d6 is most often a Pirc. I never denied that. I only denied that it was always classified as a Pirc by chessgames.com, which you originally suggested.
From post #5:
"But Chessgames.com, that should be norm in this case, lists everything that opens with 1. e4 d6 as Pirc"
At any rate, that's not so important.
Like I said, sure, most sites do end up just picking one of the opening designations, and like you don't really care which it is.
That's fine, but for the reasons I gave is less helpful for study.
Again, as with all things that are just about terminology, neither scheme is "wrong", and they are just more or less useful for different purposes, and make some people happy and some people not.
You like the scheme on chessgames.com, and don't like it here. I like the one used here and don't like the one on chessgames.com.
Neither is wrong, but neither can make everyone happy. Just the way the world works :)
From post #5:
"But Chessgames.com, that should be norm in this case, lists everything that opens with 1. e4 d6 as Pirc"
At any rate, that's not so important.
Like I said, sure, most sites do end up just picking one of the opening designations, and like you don't really care which it is.
That's fine, but for the reasons I gave is less helpful for study.
Again, as with all things that are just about terminology, neither scheme is "wrong", and they are just more or less useful for different purposes, and make some people happy and some people not.
You like the scheme on chessgames.com, and don't like it here. I like the one used here and don't like the one on chessgames.com.
Neither is wrong, but neither can make everyone happy. Just the way the world works :)