Search "user:IndianDefense"

@gilligan841 Clever. Can't wait for people to waste an hour trying to solve this...

Lichess only considers players who have played in the past week for its calculations iirc. Chess.com on the other hand uses its entire playerbase, including the people who made an account, played for …

~15sec average

That pretty much defeats the entire purpose of a premove.

I have experienced this as well. Reloading the page fixes it for me.

I don't know where you got the idea that chess.com has a stronger engine. Lichess uses Stockfish 15.1 for server analysis of your games, which has an estimated rating of 3850. Also, the Englund Gambit…

You can press z to turn off the engine altogether. This isn't perfect because it will still show the inaccuracies etc, but the evaluations won't be there. I do wish there was a way to just see the mov…

Your account is banned. See lichess.org/appeal

The Marshall Gambit is considered completely sound, to the point where top-level players will go out of their way to avoid it. See the most recent world championship match, in which Ian Nepomniatschi …

That is intentional. It is customary in correspondence, even when played by snail mail or email, to allow opening books. The masters database is, essentially, a giant opening book, so it is permitted.