@lovlas said in #20:
> The process for deciding GOTM:
>
> Step 1. Games are posted in a forum thread. For februar you can find it here: lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/lichess-game-of-the-month-february-contest
> Step 2. The team goes through the forum looking for games they find fun
> Step 3. The games are voted over and a winner decided.
> Step 4. The game is posted with commentary in a blogpost. The last two times I have been lucky enough to get to annotate them.
>
> There are no objective criteria. It's just supposed to be simple harmless fun. But, if anyone has any ideas for improvements I am sure the people behind it would love to hear about it.
Thank you for your precisions. As i already said, good job for the annotations ! There were fun to read, and still instructive.
Who are the voters though ? Is it a a small team of title players, or is it the votes of the community using the lichess reaction buttons ? (sorry if this information is already written somewhere)
> The process for deciding GOTM:
>
> Step 1. Games are posted in a forum thread. For februar you can find it here: lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/lichess-game-of-the-month-february-contest
> Step 2. The team goes through the forum looking for games they find fun
> Step 3. The games are voted over and a winner decided.
> Step 4. The game is posted with commentary in a blogpost. The last two times I have been lucky enough to get to annotate them.
>
> There are no objective criteria. It's just supposed to be simple harmless fun. But, if anyone has any ideas for improvements I am sure the people behind it would love to hear about it.
Thank you for your precisions. As i already said, good job for the annotations ! There were fun to read, and still instructive.
Who are the voters though ? Is it a a small team of title players, or is it the votes of the community using the lichess reaction buttons ? (sorry if this information is already written somewhere)
It is voted on by members of the lichess team. So there are people at every level and with various preferences. It might be fun to find a way to let the user base vote. But unless there were some sort of quality control it could easily be manipulated
<Comment deleted by user>
Game of the month
@Khiyarr said in #27:
> Mofo youre elo isnt even that high ... Stop eating his meat bro
Neither is yours, besides , is there anything wrong with having the same opinion as someone and making a light joke? While you and others might disagree, I thought the game was quite nice, while it might not be the greatest game of the month ever or even game in general, it was instructive in some ways, had nice analysis, and was worth the time.
> Mofo youre elo isnt even that high ... Stop eating his meat bro
Neither is yours, besides , is there anything wrong with having the same opinion as someone and making a light joke? While you and others might disagree, I thought the game was quite nice, while it might not be the greatest game of the month ever or even game in general, it was instructive in some ways, had nice analysis, and was worth the time.
@DARSH-MASTER said in #6:
> IQ=00000000000000000000000000000000000000
Imagine you added a 1!!!!
@DARSH-MASTER said in #6:
> IQ=100000000000000000000000000000000000000
See difference
> IQ=00000000000000000000000000000000000000
Imagine you added a 1!!!!
@DARSH-MASTER said in #6:
> IQ=100000000000000000000000000000000000000
See difference